EU’s AI Act: How Regulation Shapes the Future of Work

The EU’s AI Act marks a pivotal moment in the regulation of artificial intelligence worldwide. As the first comprehensive legal framework dedicated to AI, this regulation aims to foster a trustworthy AI environment by ensuring respect for fundamental rights and ethical principles. Unveiled by the European Union, the Act is designed to shape the future of work by categorizing AI systems based on their risk levels and implementing stringent compliance requirements for high-risk applications.

At its core, the AI Act envisions a balanced approach that champions innovation while safeguarding societal values. By setting clear standards and responsibilities, the legislation lays the groundwork for the responsible deployment of AI technology across various sectors. This regulation underscores the importance of reliable data governance, transparency, and human oversight, reflecting the EU’s commitment to ethical AI development and usage.

Key Takeaways

• The AI Act is the first global legal framework specifically regulating AI.
• AI systems are classified into four risk levels: minimal/no risk, limited risk, high risk, and unacceptable risk.
• High-risk AI systems are subject to rigorous standards and compliance requirements.
• The Act mandates transparency obligations, particularly for high-risk AI applications.
• Unacceptable risk AI systems are banned to protect ethical and societal values.
• By 2025, the European Commission aims to finalize guidelines for General-Purpose AI.
• Non-compliance with high-risk AI regulations can lead to substantial fines.

Overview of the EU’s AI Act

The EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) is a landmark regulation, marking its adoption in 2024. As the world’s first comprehensive AI law, it sets out a structured introduction to the AI Act by defining the journey from its initial drafts started by the European Commission in 2021 to its full enactment in 2024.

Central to the AI Act is its risk-based approach, classifying AI systems into distinct categories. This includes Unacceptable Risk, High Risk, Limited Risk, and Minimal Risk. AI systems falling under the ‘High Risk’ tag are subject to stringent obligations such as ensuring data quality, transparency, human oversight, accuracy, robustness, and security before market entry.

To ensure compliance, the AI Act institutes rigorous requirements for providers, deployers, and operators. These include maintaining robust risk management systems and adhering to data governance, technical documentation, and human oversight protocols.

Fines for non-compliance are significant, aligning with the findings of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and can reach up to 7% of the annual global turnover. This stringent enforcement mechanism is facilitated by the newly fledged Office for Artificial Intelligence and national authorities.

The AI Act also forefronts the role of generative AI, imposing transparency mandates such as indicating AI-generated content and preventing the creation of illegal content. This drive towards transparency is a critical component of the Act’s broader goals.

In essence, the introduction to the AI Act positions it as a potential global benchmark for AI governance, potentially leading to broader worldwide adoption of similar regulatory frameworks.

Regulatory Framework and Its Scope

The EU’s AI Act outlines a comprehensive regulatory framework that significantly impacts how AI systems will be governed across the European market. With a favorable vote ratio of 523 to 46, the regulation received overwhelming support in the European Parliament, demonstrating a strong consensus on the need for structured oversight of AI technologies. A key element of the Act is the definition of AI systems under the Act, which aims to standardize and clarify what constitutes an AI system, mitigating any ambiguities in interpretation.

The Act categorizes AI systems into four distinct risk levels: unacceptable risk, high risk, limited risk, and minimal risk. Each category carries specific regulatory requirements designed to address the unique challenges and potential dangers of AI deployment. For instance, AI systems deemed to present an unacceptable risk, like those influencing human behavior to the detriment of fundamental rights, will face outright prohibitions starting February 2025.

Specifically exempted from the Act are AI systems developed and used exclusively for military applications, recognizing the need to delineate between civilian and defense technologies. Additionally, AI activities and projects still in the research phase, prior to market introduction, are also excluded, providing space for innovation while ensuring critical oversight post-commercialization. This balanced approach strikes a harmony between regulation and fostering innovation, which remains a central theme of the EU’s AI Act.

Understanding the definition of AI systems under the Act and its overarching principles will be crucial for businesses and policymakers alike, especially since it extends its scope extraterritorially. Companies outside the EU that aim to place AI systems on the European market must comply with these regulations, highlighting its global ramifications. The Act’s staggered compliance timelines, ranging from 2025 to 2027, offer entities a structured adjustment period to align with the new regulatory requirements, facilitating a smoother transition to this new legal landscape.

The European Commission will conduct its first annual review of the EU AI Act in August 2025, evaluating its efficacy and proposing necessary amendments. This iterative review process underscores a commitment to maintain the Act’s relevance amidst rapid technological advancements and evolving societal needs.

Risk-Based Classification of AI Systems

The EU AI Act, proposed in April 2021, introduces the first comprehensive regulatory framework for AI in the European Union. This regulation classifies AI systems based on the level of risk they pose, determining the extent of regulation each will undergo. Notably, unacceptable risk AI systems that threaten safety and fundamental rights will be banned entirely.

High-risk AI systems are those used in critical sectors such as toys, aviation, cars, medical devices, and lifts. These systems must be registered in the EU database and include categories such as:

• Management and operation of critical infrastructure
• Education and vocational training
• Employment and worker management
• Access to essential private and public services
• Law enforcement
• Migration, asylum, and border control management
• Assistance in legal interpretation

All high-risk AI systems are subject to rigorous assessment before they reach the market and continuous monitoring throughout their lifecycle. For example, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has already reviewed and authorized over 690 AI/ML-enabled medical devices, a sector likely to be significantly impacted by the AI Act’s compliance requirements.

Additionally, general-purpose AI models, such as GPT-4, will undergo stringent evaluations, including transparency guidelines. These obligations will necessitate that companies disclose AI-generated content, implement preventive designs to avoid generating illegal content, and publish summaries of copyrighted training data, ensuring a transparent AI development process.

The AI Act categorizes AI systems into prohibited AI, high-risk AI systems, general-purpose AI, and low-risk AI systems. Notably, high-risk AI systems must adhere to strict compliance obligations concerning risk management, data governance, transparency, and human oversight. AI systems classified under these categories demand a conformity assessment and post-market monitoring, while those with minimal or no risk only need to follow transparency obligations.

The AI Act, approved by the Council in May 2024, aims to balance innovation with safety and ethical considerations, ensuring a safer and more transparent future for AI in the EU.

Impact of the AI Act on Businesses

The introduction of the EU’s AI Act, proposed by the European Commission on April 21, 2021, and expected to be enforced by 2024, brings significant implications for businesses across Europe. This regulatory framework, aimed at ensuring transparency and ethical use of AI, impacts industries from aviation to automotive and medical devices to industrial machinery.

The stringent compliance requirements, especially for high-risk AI systems like facial recognition and recruitment tools, reflect a substantial AI Regulation Impact across all sectors. Companies now face a challenging landscape of mandatory safety tests and the need to embed quality and bias mitigation measures into their AI development processes.

One of the pivotal aspects of the AI Act is its Impact on Labor Market. With AI’s growing role in various industries, businesses are compelled to reassess their workforce strategies. AI can augment productivity but mandates for transparency and human oversight ensure that automation does not lead to unfair labor practices or job losses without proper scrutiny. The Impact on Labor Market is further intensified by the EU’s approach to data protection and fair AI integration, ensuring workers’ rights are safeguarded.

The regulatory burden is notable, with Business Compliance becoming a cornerstone of operational strategies. Non-compliance can attract penalties of up to €40 million or 6% of a company’s global annual turnover, reinforcing the need for stringent adherence to the new rules. This is a substantial administrative load, particularly for SMEs, which must now navigate complex compliance requirements without the extensive resources of larger enterprises.

Despite these challenges, the AI Regulation Impact also opens doors for innovation. The emphasis on ethical innovation drives businesses to explore new ways to leverage AI, ultimately leading to market opportunities within a controlled and secure environment. The Act’s global reach, as seen with the “Brussels Effect” from GDPR, suggests that European Business could set international standards, promoting uniform practices and potentially benefitting from being early adopters of such regulations.

The following table provides a snapshot of how different aspects of the AI Act influence various business dimensions:

Compliance Requirements for High-Risk AI Systems

The EU’s AI Act imposes stringent compliance requirements on high-risk AI systems to ensure safety, transparency, and accountability. High-risk AI systems, identified under specific use cases in Annex III, must adhere to various regulatory mandates including comprehensive risk management, human oversight mechanisms, and meticulous documentation processes.

Providers of high-risk AI systems must establish a detailed risk management system throughout the AI system’s lifecycle. This includes ensuring that data sets used are relevant, representative, error-free, and complete. Furthermore, providers must implement robust human oversight mechanisms to maintain the highest levels of accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity.

One of the key aspects of AI system regulation under the AI Act involves mandatory documentation and traceability. Providers must maintain comprehensive records to identify risks and substantial modifications made during the system’s lifecycle. This documentation is crucial not only for compliance but also for fostering trust and transparency in AI technologies.

Companies intending to deploy high-risk AI systems in the EU, regardless of their geographical location, must comply with these stringent regulations. The EU AI compliance framework also specifies requirements for high-risk AI systems used in critical sectors such as biometrics, critical infrastructure, education, employment, and law enforcement, to name a few.

The publication date of the AI Act is July 12, 2024, with the effective date being August 1, 2024. The time from the release of the original text to the publication is over three years, reflecting the thorough and nuanced process behind this regulatory framework. The AI Act delineates that the compliance requirements for high-risk AI systems are substantially more stringent compared to those for limited or minimal risk systems.

By integrating these compliance requirements, the EU aims to mitigate risks associated with AI technology, ensuring that high-risk AI systems operate safely and transparently within the EU market.

The Role of the European AI Office in Implementation

The European AI Office plays a crucial role in the implementation and enforcement mechanisms of the AI Act across the 27 EU Member States. This office is integral in ensuring that the stringent requirements of the AI Act are adhered to, both pre and post-market.

Central to its operation, the office is staffed by over 140 professionals, including technology specialists, lawyers, policy experts, and economists. These experts work within 5 distinct units and are guided by 2 advisors, highlighting the multidisciplinary approach necessary for effective AI policy implementation.

The enforcement mechanisms are designed to ensure ongoing compliance. One of the pivotal aspects is the monitoring of general-purpose AI (GPAI) models and systems. The office undertakes this task by gathering information through structured dialogues with GPAI model providers, initiating model evaluations when provided documentation is insufficient, and leveraging APIs for comprehensive oversight. Additionally, serious incidents reported by systemic GPAI providers trigger binding mitigation measures.

The AI Office facilitates coordinated enforcement, crucial for banned and high-risk AI systems, ensuring a unified approach across all Member States.

An essential component of the AI Office’s function is the facilitation of regulatory sandboxes. These controlled environments allow companies to test their AI systems, promoting innovation while ensuring compliance. This aligns with initiatives like ‘GenAI4EU,’ part of the AI innovation package launched in January 2024, which supports startups and SMEs.

By Q2 2025, the AI Office, alongside the AI Board, will develop codes of practice that encapsulate GPAI obligations and KPIs. These efforts are designed to foster a presumption of conformity for GPAI model providers who adhere to these standards. Moreover, compliance rates will be meticulously monitored, with corrective actions mandated for any non-compliance identified.

The office’s remit extends to supporting 14 industrial ecosystems, with particular attention to sectors like robotics, health, biotech, manufacturing, mobility, climate, and virtual worlds. This broad scope ensures that the AI Act not only enforces regulations but also contributes to the development of emerging applications across these diverse sectors.

Overall, the European AI Office is a linchpin in the AI Act’s implementation, providing robust enforcement mechanisms and fostering a regulatory environment that promotes innovation while ensuring stringent adherence to AI standards.

The Future of Work Under the EU’s AI Act

The passing of the EU’s AI Act by a significant margin of 523-46 on March 13, 2024, marks a pivotal step in shaping the Future of Work. Set to be rolled out in phases through 2027, this regulation is poised to have a profound influence, particularly in how Automation transforms job roles in the EU Labor Market.

High-risk systems, especially those used in employment such as resume sorting and performance monitoring, are set to undergo vigorous scrutiny. The AI Workforce Impact includes both potential job displacement and the creation of new job categories, necessitating a robust approach to re-skilling workers to adapt to these changes. Notably, AI systems utilized in education and vocational training that affect access to learning, like exam scoring, are also classified as high-risk.

This regulatory approach looks not only to mitigate risks but to foster a trustworthy AI ecosystem, benefiting long-term growth. For companies, the stakes are high – non-compliance could result in fines of up to 7% of global revenue or $38 million. However, the implications extend further, potentially influencing global work policies as other countries, including Japan, consider similar legislation.

Here is a summarized view of key facets shaping the Future of Work with the implementation of the EU’s AI Act:

The extensive reach of this regulation, even impacting US companies with EU customers, further underscores its potential to redefine the Future of Work across multiple jurisdictions.

Ensuring Safety and Transparency in AI

Safety and transparency have become pivotal in the evolving landscape of artificial intelligence. The EU AI Act introduces regulations aimed directly at ensuring these key values are upheld. One critical aspect is the mandated transparency obligations tailored to various AI risk levels: High-Risk AI Systems (HRAIS), General-Purpose AI (GPAI) models, and a general transparency regime for other relevant AI systems.

High-Risk AI Systems, for instance, are subject to stringent transparency rules under the EU AI Act, with providers required to ensure comprehensive information about the system’s characteristics and functioning is clearly communicated in the ‘instructions for use.’ This is designed to aid deployers in understanding the system’s operations thoroughly.

General-Purpose AI models, on the other hand, must include detailed technical documentation that covers training, testing, and evaluation processes. Providers are mandated to supply this information to AI system providers that utilize the GPAI models, ensuring clarity on their capabilities and limitations.

Moreover, AI systems that interact directly with humans must transparently inform individuals about this interaction, particularly when it’s not immediately apparent. For systems generating synthetic content, it is compulsory to label outputs in a machine-readable format to indicate the artificial generation or manipulation.

The deployers of AI systems generating deep fake content face additional obligations to disclose the artificial production or modification to individuals. This principle extends to AI systems manipulating text of public interest, mandating the disclosure of artificial creation or modification to keep the public informed.

Transparency requirements are communicated during the initial interaction with the AI system, ensuring users are aware and informed from the onset. Furthermore, public skepticism in Europe highlights the importance of robust compliance with the transparency obligations to build trust and confidence in AI technologies.

Overall, by instituting these measures, the EU AI Act aims to create an environment of trust and accountability, ensuring that AI systems adhere to strict transparency obligations and ethical standards, thereby fostering a more reliable and secure AI future.

Human Oversight and Accountability

The EU’s AI Act, enacted in March 2024, underscores the necessity of human oversight and robust AI accountability in AI deployment. One critical mandate is ensuring that high-risk AI systems are always under human supervision to prevent unethical AI behaviors. This becomes particularly vital in scenarios where autonomous AI solutions might make decisions with significant real-world implications, such as healthcare XR solutions.

Healthcare XR solutions, for instance, fall under the high-risk category due to their profound impact on patient care. To illustrate the importance of maintaining ethical AI use in such sensitive applications, the ISO/IEC 23053 and 23894 standards provide comprehensive frameworks for describing and managing these systems.

The EU categorizes AI systems into four risk levels: unacceptable risk, high risk, limited risk, and low/minimal risk. High-risk AI systems, which require rigorous standards, include not just healthcare applications but also autonomous vehicles and financial systems, where the costs of failure or unethical behavior are significant. Providers must implement meticulous AI accountability measures such as thorough data quality documentation and seamless record-keeping practices to comply with the EU’s regulations.

Furthermore, the EU mandates that these high-risk systems undergo pre-market assessments and consistent post-market monitoring. This dual-layer oversight is designed to ensure that AI systems remain safe and ethical throughout their lifecycle. ISO 31000 and ISO/IEC Guide 51 establish safety guidelines, ensuring a comprehensive risk management approach across the product lifecycle.

With the implementation of the Amendment to the Product Liability Directive and the AI Liability Directive, the EU seeks to simplify the liability and compensation processes for AI-related harms. These directives enhance consumer protection, thereby reinforcing AI accountability and ensuring that the necessary human oversight is always in place.

In summary, the EU’s AI Act significantly emphasizes human oversight and ethical AI use to avoid potential malpractices, especially in high-stakes areas like healthcare. This approach necessitates a collaborative effort among AI developers, users, and regulators to create a responsible AI ecosystem.

Supporting Innovation and SMEs

The implementation of the AI Act is structured to foster innovation and provide significant support to SMEs (Small and Medium-sized Enterprises). One of the critical components in this effort is the establishment of Regulatory Sandboxes. These experimental environments are designed to allow businesses to test and refine their AI technologies under reduced regulatory constraints, promoting creativity and agility within the sector.

Since the AI Act was formally adopted by the Council of the EU in May 2024, Member States have been working diligently to designate at least one notifying authority and one market surveillance authority for the purpose. This infrastructure supports the growth of SMEs by providing clear guidance and oversight. Moreover, Regulatory Sandboxes will be established at national and/or regional levels, which will create supervised development environments that facilitate the compliance and commercialization of new AI innovations.

To further this goal, the European Commission (EC) recognizes the importance of harmonized standards and technical frameworks. The EC intends to promote investment and innovation in AI by developing harmonized standards, projected to be published by spring 2025. This initiative is expected to enhance the growth of the EU market and ensure that companies comply with the AI Act effectively and efficiently.

A significant part of the AI Act’s broader framework includes financial measures aimed at supporting European startups and SMEs. EU startups sometimes face difficulties in funding compared to their US counterparts, with regulatory compliance costs being an integral part of product development. The Act’s tailored assessment process for SMEs reflects a deep understanding of these unique challenges and underlines the commitment to facilitating innovation despite the stringent regulations.

The provision of documentation and technical support is another vital aspect designed to help businesses navigate the complex landscape of AI compliance. By leveraging these resources, companies can better implement AI solutions in a manner consistent with regulatory requirements, thus minimizing potential non-compliance penalties.

By implementing these targeted measures, including Regulatory Sandboxes and technical support, the AI Act aims to create a balanced environment that safeguards public interests while promoting innovation. This approach ensures that SMEs have the necessary tools and resources to thrive in the evolving AI landscape, ultimately contributing to a robust and competitive market within the EU.

Global Implications of the EU’s AI Act

The EU Artificial Intelligence Act, set to take effect on August 1, 2024, is poised to redefine the global landscape of AI regulation. This pioneering legislation categorizes AI systems into four distinct risk categories: unacceptable risk, high risk, limited risk, and minimal risk. By setting these benchmarks, the EU aims to establish a robust framework for ethical AI development.

Unacceptable risk AI systems, such as social scoring mechanisms, are outrightly prohibited, while high-risk AI systems are subject to stringent testing and certification processes. This categorization underscores the EU’s commitment to ensuring high standards of accuracy, reliability, and transparency within AI applications.

The scope and rigor of the EU’s AI Act suggest a significant influence on international AI policy, as other regions may look to adopt or adapt similar regulations. This influence is already seen when comparing the AI Act with other frameworks such as the OECD guidelines. The AI Act’s proactive stance echoes the established principles of transparency, safety, and ethical AI use stipulated by the OECD.

Below is a comparison between the EU’s AI Act and other international regulatory frameworks:

The EU AI Act’s focus on supporting start-ups and SMEs by providing testing environments also sets a global precedent in promoting innovation while ensuring compliance. The establishment of governance structures such as the AI Office and the European Artificial Intelligence Board enhances the oversight and monitoring capabilities necessary for this evolving technological landscape.

One of the key challenges identified is the “pacing problem,” where the fast-paced evolution of technology may outstrip legislative processes. This scenario necessitates continuous updates to ensure that the AI Act remains relevant and effective. Moreover, certification requirements may consolidate the AI service market, as seen in the cloud infrastructure domain, fostering a competitive, but regulated environment.

As the AI Act applies to all 27 EU member states, its implementation could very well serve as a blueprint for international AI regulation. Industry experts suggest that the act’s comprehensive approach might even influence legal practices in the U.S., reflecting a broad influence on international AI policy. Future regulatory landscapes will likely integrate lessons learned from the EU AI Act, shaping a more globally cohesive AI governance model.

Conclusion

As the world marches forward in the era of advanced technology, the EU’s AI Act stands as a monumental step in shaping the future of work and AI developments. By adopting a risk-based classification system, the Act ensures comprehensive regulatory measures tailored to the specific risks posed by various AI systems. This AI Regulatory Impact is crucial for creating a balanced ecosystem where innovation thrives within the boundaries of safety and ethical standards.

Businesses are compelled to align with stringent compliance requirements, particularly for high-risk AI systems, which has far-reaching implications across multiple sectors, including financial services. The Act’s emphasis on transparency, human oversight, and accountability signifies a profound shift towards fostering Ethical AI. This regulatory framework is designed to phase out prohibited AI systems by early 2025, while companies must adhere to general-purpose AI requirements by mid-2025 and achieve full legislative compliance by 2026.

In conclusion, the EU’s AI Act not only influences European markets but also sets a global precedent for AI legislation. This holistic approach ensures that AI technologies evolve responsibly, mitigating systemic risks while promoting innovation. As the deadlines approach, the Act will undoubtedly sculpt the landscape of Future AI Developments, creating a robust foundation for ethical and innovative advancements in the AI industry. The journey ahead, while challenging, promises a future where AI operates within well-defined ethical and legal frameworks, benefiting society at large.

Source Links

• https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai – AI Act
• https://thoropass.com/blog/compliance/eu-ai-act/ – The EU AI Act: Key provisions and future impacts – Thoropass
• https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/eu-ai-act-shaping-future-artificial-intelligence-simon-hodgkins-zylze – The EU AI Act: Shaping the Future of Artificial Intelligence Regulation
• https://www.orrick.com/en/Insights/2024/10/The-EU-AI-Act-A-Comprehensive-Overview – The EU AI Act: A Comprehensive Overview
• https://legalsolutions.thomsonreuters.co.uk/blog/2024/08/08/ai-act-the-worlds-first-comprehensive-laws-to-regulate-ai/ – How the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act will affect professionals | Legal Insights Europe
• https://termly.io/resources/articles/eu-ai-act/ – EU AI Act: A First Look at Europe’s AI Regulation
• https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/general-purpose-ai-regulation-and-ai-act – General-purpose AI regulation and the European Union AI Act
• https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20230601STO93804/eu-ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence – EU AI Act: first regulation on artificial intelligence | Topics | European Parliament
• https://www.lw.com/admin/upload/SiteAttachments/EU-AI-Act-Navigating-a-Brave-New-World.pdf – PDF
• https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01232-3 – Navigating the EU AI Act: implications for regulated digital medical products – npj Digital Medicine
• https://www.datadynamicsinc.com/quick-bytes-the-eu-ais-act-an-in-depth-exploration-of-its-implications-and-how-it-shapes-the-landscape-for-individuals-and-businesses/ – EU AI Act: Impact & Implications for All
• https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-eu-ai-act-will-have-global-impact-but-a-limited-brussels-effect/ – The EU AI Act will have global impact, but a limited Brussels Effect
• https://www.osborneclarke.com/insights/new-eu-ai-act-poised-shape-future-life-sciences-europe – New EU AI Act is poised to shape the future for life sciences in Europe
• https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/high-level-summary/ – Job Opportunities at the European AI Office for Legal and Policy Backgrounds
• https://www.dlapiper.com/en/insights/publications/ai-outlook/2024/eu-publishes-its-ai-act-key-considerations-for-organizations – EU publishes its AI Act: Key steps for organizations | DLA Piper
• https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/ai-office – European AI Office
• https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/the-ai-office-summary/ – Job Opportunities at the European AI Office for Legal and Policy Backgrounds
• https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/geotech-cues/eu-ai-act-sets-the-stage-for-global-ai-governance-implications-for-us-companies-and-policymakers/ – EU AI Act sets the stage for global AI governance: Implications for US companies and policymakers
• https://www.pymnts.com/news/artificial-intelligence/2023/this-week-in-ai-healthcare-gpts-european-union-legislation-future-work/ – This Week in AI: Healthcare GPTs, EU’s AI Act, the Future of Work | PYMNTS.com
• https://www.euaiact.com/key-issue/5 – Key Issue 5: Transparency Obligations – EU AI Act
• https://cacm.acm.org/research/the-eu-ai-act-and-the-wager-on-trustworthy-ai/ – The EU AI Act and the Wager on Trustworthy AI
• https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11379845/ – Navigating the EU AI Act: implications for regulated digital medical products
• https://petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2024/05/20/from-regulation-to-innovation-the-impact-of-the-eu-ai-act-on-xr-and-ai-in-healthcare/ – From Regulation to Innovation: The Impact of the EU AI Act on XR and AI in Healthcare – Petrie-Flom Center
• https://www.csis.org/blogs/strategic-technologies-blog/ai-regulation-coming-what-likely-outcome – AI Regulation is Coming- What is the Likely Outcome?
• https://global-workplace-law-and-policy.kluwerlawonline.com/2024/06/20/the-eus-ai-act-governing-through-uncertainty-and-complexity-identifying-opportunities-for-action/ – The EU’s AI Act: Governing through uncertainty and complexity, identifying opportunities for action – Global Workplace Law & Policy
• https://therecursive.com/the-eu-ai-act-explained-by-the-experts-will-it-hinder-or-enhance-the-innovation/ – The EU AI Act Explained by the Experts: Will It Hinder or Enhance Innovation?
• https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2024/08/navigating-the-ai-era-insights-and-implications-of-the-eu-artificial-intelligence-act/ – Navigating the AI Era: Insights and Implications of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act
• https://www.axiomlaw.com/blog/eu-ai-act-insights-implications – EU AI Act: Six Insights into Its Global Implications
• https://kpmg.com/xx/en/our-insights/eu-tax/decoding-the-eu-artificial-intelligence-act.html – Decoding the EU Artificial Intelligence Act
• https://www.ey.com/en_ch/insights/forensic-integrity-services/the-eu-ai-act-what-it-means-for-your-business – The EU AI Act: What it means for your business
• https://www.law.northwestern.edu/research-faculty/clbe/events/standardization/documents/nizza_assessing_impact_ai_act_innovation.pdf – PDF